Showing posts with label Financial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Financial. Show all posts

No love for 'fiscal cliff,' 'spoiler alert'


No love for 'fiscal cliff,' 'spoiler alert' — Spoiler alert: This story contains words and phrases that some people want to ban from the English language. "Spoiler alert" is among them. So are "kick the can down the road," ''trending" and "bucket list."

A dirty dozen have landed on the 38th annual List of Words to be Banished from the Queen's English for Misuse, Overuse and General Uselessness. The nonbinding, tongue-in-cheek decree released Monday by northern Michigan's Lake Superior State University is based on nominations submitted from the United States, Canada and beyond.

"Spoiler alert," the seemingly thoughtful way to warn readers or viewers about looming references to a key plot point in a film or TV show, nevertheless passed its use-by date for many, including Joseph Foly, of Fremont, Calif. He argued in his submission the phrase is "used as an obnoxious way to show one has trivial information and is about to use it, no matter what."


At the risk of further offense, here's another spoiler alert: The phrase receiving the most nominations this year is "fiscal cliff," banished because of its overuse by media outlets when describing across-the-board federal tax increases and spending cuts that economists say could harm the economy in the new year without congressional action.

"You can't turn on the news without hearing this," said Christopher Loiselle, of Midland, Mich., in his submission. "I'm equally worried about the River of Debt and Mountain of Despair."

Other terms coming in for a literary lashing are "superfood," ''guru," ''job creators" and "double down."

University spokesman Tom Pink said that in nearly four decades, the Sault Ste. Marie school has "banished" around 900 words or phrases, and somehow the whole idea has survived rapidly advancing technology and diminishing attention spans.

Nominations used to come by mail, then fax and via the school's website, he said. Now most come through the university's Facebook page. That's fitting, since social media has helped accelerate the life cycle of certain words and phrases, such as this year's entry "YOLO" — "you only live once."

"The list surprises me in one way or another every year, and the same way every year: I'm always surprised how people still like it, love it," he said.

Rounding out the list are "job creators/creation," ''boneless wings" and "passion/passionate." Those who nominated the last one say they are tired of hearing about a company's "passion" as a substitute for providing a service or product for money.

Andrew Foyle, of Bristol, England, said it's reached the point where "passion" is the only ingredient that keeps a chef from preparing "seared tuna" that tastes "like dust swept from a station platform."

"Apparently, it's insufficient to do it ably, with skill, commitment or finesse," Foyle said. "Passionate, begone!"

As usual, the etymological exercise — or exorcise — only goes so far. Past lists haven't eradicated "viral," "amazing," ''LOL" or "man cave" from everyday use. ( Associated Press )

READ MORE - No love for 'fiscal cliff,' 'spoiler alert'

Stop Getting Ripped Off on Auto Insurance


Stop Getting Ripped Off on Auto Insurance - Now is the perfect time to give your auto insurance a tune-up. Here are ten tips on how you can do it.

Do you feel like you're spending more on auto insurance than you need to? Want 2013 to be the year you put money back into your wallet?

Good news: You're likely already doing things that can help you save.

In fact, a 2012 trends survey by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) found that 53 percent of Americans have made an economic-driven change that could impact the cost of their car insurance in the past year.

Read on for some additional tips on potential car insurance savings that can help you stay on budget this year...

http://images.vantage-media.net/a/clients/Portals/yap/stories/1271.jpg

Tip #1 - Shop Around

The Internet has redefined shopping. And that holds true with auto insurance. In fact, it's never been easier to shop for a lower rate.

But don't shop by price alone, advises Insurance Information Institute's (III) Vice President Loretta Worters. "Buying insurance is not just to protect you financially, it's also to provide peace of mind. So, it's important to pick a company that is financially stable," she says.

She suggests asking friends and relatives about their insurers, or contacting your state insurance department to find out whether they provide information on consumer complaints by company.

Here are other shopping suggestions from Worters:
  • Get at least three quotes.
  • Give the same information to all three companies; this ensures your comparison will be more accurate.
  • Check the financial health of insurance companies with rating companies such as A.M. Best and Standard & Poor's.
Tip #2 - Don't Over-Insure

There's a word for paying for something you'll never use: frustrating. Unfortunately, many people over-insure with auto insurance, according to Worters.

For example, collision and/or comprehensive coverage, which protect your car in the event it's damaged, may not be necessary on an older car. Worters' general rule: if your car is worth less than 10 times the premium, buying the coverage may not be cost-effective.

Information from NAIC's website also suggests that if a car is worth less than $1,000, you should consider only carrying liability coverage, which protects from damage you do to others or to property. This is because you'll likely pay more in premiums than the insurance will payoff, if and when you file a claim.

Tip #3 - Pay a Higher Deductible

Ironically, raising your deductible, the amount you'll pay out-of-pocket in the case of a claim, could be a great savings opportunity.

How? According to an III article titled "How Can I Save Money on Auto Insurance?," increasing your deductible from $200 to $500 could reduce your collision and comprehensive coverage cost by 15 to 30 percent. If you raise your deductible to $1,000, your savings could climb to 40 percent or more.

If you decide to pursue this potential money-saving route, make sure you have the funds to cover the deductible in the case of an accident.

Tip #4 - Cash in on That Wedding

If you got married since you last renewed your policy, be sure to let your insurer know.

"Generally speaking, you can save money when you get married since married people file fewer claims than singles," says Worters. Therefore, married people are considered less of a risk than single people and can often qualify for lower premiums.

On the other end of the spectrum, if 2013 is a year of divorce instead of marriage, you still might be able to save if your ex had a bad driving record.

Tip #5 - Remove Children from Your Policy

Is your son or daughter going off to college this year? If so, you could save by labeling him or her as only an occasional driver on your policy. This means your child will only drive your car while home for vacation or holidays. And the savings could be significant.

Parents typically see a 50 percent increase in their insurance premiums if a child under 25 years old is listed on their policy, says Worters.

However, to qualify for a potentially lower premium, most insurers will require that the college your son or daughter attends is at least 100 miles from home, according to "Auto Insurance FAQ's" from NAIC's website.

Tip #6 - Drive Less

Driving less is trending. At least that's what the 2012 NAIC survey on economy-driven trends found. It states that almost 40 percent of consumers are diving less, instead choosing to carpool, walk, or take public transportation more often. If you're a part of that 40 percent, you could qualify for a low-mileage discount.

"You could save 10 to 20 percent, depending on factors like which state you live in," says Worters. So check your mileage. If it's 10,000 miles per year or less, you could be in for some good news about your premium, according to an III article, "What Determines the Price of my Policy."

Tip # 7 - Buy a Different Car

Are you thinking about buying a new car this year? Don't forget to check the insurance prices for the various makes and models you're considering. It could make a big difference.

Car insurance premiums are based in part on the car's price, the cost to repair it, its overall safety record, and the likelihood of theft, according to Worters. And if you thought only pimped-out luxury rides got targeted by thieves, think again.

The three most stolen cars in the U.S. for 2011 were the Honda Accord, Honda Civic, and Toyota Camry, according to the National Insurance Crime Bureau's "Hot Wheels" report.

So, before you pick out your new ride for 2013, make sure to research the car's stats and determine whether or not the insurance premium is in your budget.

Tip # 8 - Move Out of the City

Like marriage, you likely won't be moving out of the city based on auto insurance rates. But if you have moved out of the city, or if changes in your work allow you to drive and park in less urban areas, make sure your insurer gets the good news. Because to them, that's exactly what it is.

In fact, insurers consider cities so much more of a risk because of traffic (increased accidents), theft, and vandalism, that the 10 highest places to insure a car in 2011 were all populous cities, according to III.

And because we know you're curious, here are the three costliest places in the U.S. to insure a car:*
  • Detroit, Mich.- Average annual premium: $5,941
  • Philadelphia, Pa.- Average annual premium: $4,076
  • New Orleans, La. - Average annual premium: $3,599
Tip #9 - Use an Anti-Theft Device

Since stolen cars mean insurance payouts, there are some anti-theft devices that will garner you substantial savings.

For instance, says Worters, signing up for LoJack - which uses a hidden transmitter to let police track your car if and when it gets stolen - could net you a 15 to 20 percent discount.

Just make sure that whatever savings you get pays for the anti-theft device, if that's your primary purpose for using it. Of course, getting your stolen car back is kind of a nice thing, too.

Tip #10 - Take Advantage of Any and All Discounts

From being a good student to simply aging, there are a number of auto insurance discounts that you could potentially qualify for. But, don't expect your insurance carrier to automatically sign you up for discounts for which you qualify.

To get you started, here are a few common discounts:**

  • Mature Driver - Many insurers lower rates by 10 to 20 percent for drivers over 50 or 55, according to Worters.
  • Good Credit Score - Better credit usually equals a better rate, but not all states allow for credit-based insurance scores.
  • Good Student Discount - Usually requires a B average for a full-time student.
  • Passive Restraints - This is for seat belts that automatically buckle when you start the car.
  • Driver Education Course - Completing a defensive driving course could qualify you for savings.
  • Bundled Insurance - Get your auto and home or renters insurance with the same company.
  • Pay in Full - Applies when you pay your entire premium in one payment rather than installments. ( yahoo.com )

READ MORE - Stop Getting Ripped Off on Auto Insurance

World stocks mixed with US "cliff" still a concern


World stocks mixed with US "cliff" still a concern — World stock markets were mixed Wednesday, with Asian shares up as China neared the climax of a once-a-decade leadership transition while Europe remained mired in uncertainty debt-swamped Greece.

Wall Street appeared headed for gains as renewed efforts got under way in Washington to resolve the impending "fiscal cliff." Dow Jones industrial futures rose 0.5 percent to 12,782 and S&P 500 futures added 0.6 percent to 1,378.50.

But European stocks fell in early trading, despite Greece's successful sale of short-term treasury bills Tuesday. Without the sale, Athens would have found it impossible to repay the €5 billion ($6.4 billion) treasury bill maturing on Friday, the day on which Prime Minister Antonis Samaras has said Greece would run out of money.


http://l1.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/gE5ESxGZUM18GceXd9qEjA--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Y2g9MjA5Mjtjcj0xO2N3PTMwMDA7ZHg9MDtkeT0wO2ZpPXVsY3JvcDtoPTQ0MDtxPTg1O3c9NjMw/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/0e04f7857d26471f200f6a7067003b90.jpg 
Associated Press/Ahn Young-joon - A currency trader reacts in front of screens showing the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI), center, and foreign exchange rate, right, at the foreign exchange dealing room of the Korea Exchange Bank headquarters in Seoul, South Korea, Thursday, Nov. 8, 2012. South Korea's Kospi dropped 1.19 percent at 1,914.43. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)

Britain's FTSE 100 lost 0.5 percent to 5,759.43. Germany's DAX was 0.1 percent lower at 7,160.64. France's CAC-40 shed 0.3 percent to 3,421.39.

Asian stocks heralded the leadership transition taking place at China's Communist Party congress this week. On Wednesday, President Hu Jintao stepped aside to make way for Vice President Xi Jinping as party leader. Traders were hopeful that the transition will be followed by greater initiatives to shore up China's listless economy.

Hong Kong's Hang Seng jumped 1.2 percent to 21,441.99. Mainland Chinese shares also gained, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising 0.4 percent to 2,055.42. The Shenzhen Composite Index gained 0.3 percent to 818.60.

Japan's Nikkei 225 index rose marginally to close at 8,664.73. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 gained 0.2 percent to 4,388.40. South Korea's Kospi brushed off earlier losses to rise 0.2 percent to 1,894.04.

Traders have to deal with the uncertainty posed in the U.S. by the looming "fiscal cliff," a set of U.S. government spending cuts and tax increases that will take effect automatically at the beginning of next year unless U.S. leaders reach a compromise before then.

Unless Congress acts, all Bush-era tax cuts would expire, raising 2013 tax bills for most Americans. Obama wants to end those tax cuts only for households making more than $250,000 a year while Republicans oppose all tax rate increases.

Worries about the impasse pushed U.S. stocks to one of their worst weekly losses of the year last week.

U.S. lawmakers gathered for talks on Tuesday, giving traders hope that at least a temporary compromise might somehow be reached before a deadline in seven weeks. President Barack Obama was to meet later Wednesday with about a dozen business executives who want to see an agreement before the end of the year.

"People feel there's been a significant pullback over fiscal cliff worries," said Andrew Sullivan, an independent market analyst in Hong Kong. "The reality is we are likely to see a solution."

Among individual stocks, Japan's Sharp Corp. soared 7.2 percent after Japanese media reports said Intel Corp., the world's largest chipmaker, was in talks with the struggling electronics maker about a business alliance.

South Korean tech shares led gains in Seoul. Chipmaker SK Hynix gained 4.9 percent. LG Electronics added 4.6 percent on an improved sales outlook for the fourth quarter, Yonhap News Agency said.

Benchmark oil for December delivery was up 14 cents to $85.52 in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract fell 19 cents to finish at $85.38 per barrel on the Nymex on Tuesday.

The euro rose to $1.2730 from $1.2705 late Tuesday in New York. The dollar rose to 79.94 yen from 79.41 yen. ( Associated Press )

READ MORE - World stocks mixed with US "cliff" still a concern

Federal Reserve flirting with higher inflation


Federal Reserve flirting with higher inflation - Will the U.S. Federal Reserve look the other way if inflation overruns its target?

Risking the wrath of politicians and the central bank's hard-won reputation for keeping prices stable, three top Fed officials are touting plans for boosting employment that explicitly allow for inflation to run above the Fed's 2.0-percent goal.

Investors are wondering just how high - and for how long - the Fed may allow inflation to rise to encourage borrowing, investment and hiring. In theory, more people working means higher output, which should narrow the gap between what American workers are currently producing and their potential.

http://img.zonebourse.com/reuters/2012-10-14T110531Z_1_CBRE89D0USE00_RTROPTP_2_USA-FED-FOMC.JPG

"The Fed's body language clearly says they think the output gap is huge and that they're willing to take risks on inflation," said Bluford Putnam, chief economist at futures exchange operator CME Group.

The Fed reduced official interest rates to near zero almost four years ago and has since then bought some $2.3 trillion in securities to boost the economy, taking the central bank deeper into uncharted policy territory.

With the U.S. economy still recovering only slowly, last month the Fed said it would keep buying bonds until the labor market outlook improves "substantially," a move that many investors expect will boost inflation, currently running below the 2.0 percent target.

Since the announcement, the central bank's top policymakers have been busy drawing their lines in the sand.

Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota says he would tolerate inflation of 2.25 percent, and John Williams of the San Francisco Fed says he's OK with 2.5 percent. The Chicago Fed's Charles Evans, considered one of the central bank's most pro-growth "doves," says he'd hold fast to low rates as long as the outlook for inflation stayed below 3 percent.

Volatility in bond markets suggests investors are adjusting their bets as to the true intentions of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and his core of policymakers, and whether they will be able to control inflation when the time comes.

"I wouldn't be surprised if they let it run to 3.0 percent for a quarter or two and still rationalize that by saying they still haven't seen unemployment go down like they want it to," said Mike Knebel, portfolio manager specializing in fixed income at Ferguson Wellman Capital Management in Portland, Oregon.

"Three percent still seems to be a fairly reasonable number in most people's minds - at least those of us who are old enough to remember when six percent was considered the norm," he said.

BERNANKE'S QUIET VICTORY

Inflation soared to over 14 percent in 1980 before the Fed under then-Chairman Paul Volcker finally wrestled it back down. Albeit far less severe, the last time inflation fears gripped the United States was in 2008, just before Lehman Brothers collapsed at the height of the financial crisis.

While inflation targeting has been a bedrock of central banking internationally for decades, the Fed only this year adopted an explicit target inflation but also, unlike most of its peers, is charged not only with keeping prices stable but also with maximizing employment.

In August, the Fed's preferred annual measure of inflation, the Commerce Deptartment's personal consumption price index was up just 1.5 percent for the year in August, while the more broadly watched U.S. Labor Department's consumer price index increased 1.7 percent. September's reading of the consumer price index is to be published on Tuesday and is forecast to see inflation at 1.9 percent.

Prices have generally stayed low and stable the last three years, representing a quiet victory for Bernanke amid fallout from the brutal recession in 2008 that threatened a period of deflation, which is the phenomenon of falling prices that held Japan in a slump for a decade.

After the central bank made its bold statement last month, announcing further bond buying until unemployment falls significantly, Bernanke was at pains to say that getting more Americans back to work would not come at the cost of higher inflation.

If inflation were to run above target, he told reporters, the Fed will bring it back to 2.0 percent "over time" as part of a balanced approach to achieving its two mandates of price stability and full employment.

One key indicator of inflation expectations, based on the gap between regular and inflation-protected U.S. Treasury bonds, jumped to a six-year high of 2.65 percent after the Fed's decision on September 13.

That so-called "breakeven" rate, which tracks expectations for inflation 10 years from now, is currently running at about 2.47 percent, according to Reuters data.

WILLIAMS NOT BUYING

Most people see inflation as a bad thing. Higher wages mean more money in consumers' pockets, but the price of everything they want to buy rises as well, typically too quickly for earnings to keep up.

Left to rise too fast for too long, inflation also risks devaluing the currency and stanching economic growth. The fact that gold prices, which usually move opposite the U.S. dollar, remain near record highs reflects concerns about future inflation.

But many influential economists believe that higher inflation expectations translate into lower "real," or inflation-adjusted, interest rates, which could stimulate the economy, an attractive selling point for a central bank running out of policy options.

Not everyone is buying the idea, including Williams, the policy-centrist chief of the San Francisco Fed, who this week announced that inflation would need to rise to 2.5 percent before he would want to rethink the Fed's low-rate policy to boost jobs.

"You would expect inflation to fluctuate within some kind of reasonable band, so say between 1.5 percent and 2.5 percent. Even in normal situations, inflation tends to fluctuate because of various shocks and events," Williams told Reuters on Wednesday.

But acknowledging that he is not troubled by inflation of up to 2.5 percent is a far cry from purposely stoking it to bring down real interest rates, or to cut the burden of household debt, he said. Firstly, he said, the Fed does not have that kind of hair-trigger control.

"The idea that you could create 4.0 percent inflation for a few years, and then bring it back to 2.0 percent, is a dream, a false dream," Williams said in his office overlooking San Francisco Bay.

The risk of trying that approach and then failing, he said, is a costly recession, the likes of which the United States has not seen since the Fed ratcheted up interest rates by about 16 percentage points to battle raging inflation through the 1970s and early 1980s.

But even if such precise managing of inflation were possible, higher inflation expectations may not generate the benefits that modern macroeconomic theory tends to predict, Williams noted. Instead of pushing up wages and house prices and trimming the real value of household debt burdens, higher inflation might simply create greater uncertainty, curbing investment and growth, he said.

Inflation could also damage the Fed's credibility, which many cite for U.S. price stability in the first place.

TRADING THE INFLATION TARGET

Supporters of more easing say the Fed has no intention of turning a blind eye to inflation.

"I disagree with the premise that what we're doing is seeking to gin up inflation," Jeremy Stein, the Fed's newest governor and a strong backer of the Fed's recent policy easing, said on Thursday.

Intentional or not, markets appear to believe that the Fed's inflation stance has shifted, if only slightly.

The brief jump in breakeven rates suggested investors are repricing the exact meaning of the central bank's inflation target, which may be warranted "if the Fed's policy stance implies a potentially somewhat higher inflation rate in coming years," said Roberto Perli, managing director of policy research at broker dealer International Strategy and Investment Group.

Charles Plosser, the head of the Philadelphia Fed and an inflation hawk who opposed the recent round of easing, warned, however, that the central bank may be sending the wrong signals.

Some people have interpreted the Fed's statement last month, that it won't start raising interest rates as soon as a U.S. economic recovery strengthens, to mean it is willing to tolerate higher inflation in order to lower the unemployment rate, Plosser said on Thursday.

"This is another risk," he said, "to the hard-won credibility the institution has built up over many years, which, if lost, will undermine economic stability." ( Reuters )

READ MORE - Federal Reserve flirting with higher inflation

US deficit tops $1 trillion for fourth year


US deficit tops $1 trillion for fourth year — The U.S. budget deficit has topped $1 trillion for a fourth straight year, but a modest improvement in economic growth helped narrow the gap by $207 billion compared with last year.

The Treasury Department said Friday the deficit for the 2012 budget year totaled $1.1 trillion. Tax revenue rose 6.4 percent from last year to more than $2.4 trillion, helping contain the deficit.

http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/tkHA0DcauV2G551d3PpOSg--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9aW5zZXQ7aD0zNDY7cT04NTt3PTM3Mg--/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/bc4ead12c8e9cd1c1d0f6a706700c640.jpg

The government's revenue rose as more people got jobs and received income. Corporations also contributed more tax revenue than in 2011.

Government spending fell 1.7 percent to $3.5 trillion. The decline reflected, in part, less defense spending as U.S. military involvement in Iraq was winding down.

Barack Obama's presidency has now coincided with four straight $1 trillion-plus annual budget deficits — the first in history and an issue in an election campaign that ends in Nov. 6.

Obama's Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, contends that Obama failed to achieve a pledge to halve the deficit he inherited by the end of his first term.

When Obama took office in January 2009, the Congressional Budget Office forecast that the deficit for that year would total $1.2 trillion. It ended up at a record $1.41 trillion.

The increase was due, in part, to higher government spending to fight the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s Tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan contributed to the deficits.

The budget gaps in 2010 and 2011 were slightly lower than the 2009 deficit as a gradually strengthening economy generated more tax revenue. But the deficits still exceeded $1 trillion.

Obama is campaigning for a second term with a pledge to cut deficits by $4 trillion over the next decade. He says he would do so by ending the Bush-era income tax cuts for higher-income Americans and by restraining the growth of spending.

Romney has said he would cut spending growth to help narrow the budget gap. He would cap spending at 20 percent of the economy by 2016. Spending in 2012 accounted for about 23 percent of the economy.

The government borrowed about 31 cents of every dollar it spent in 2012. The string of $1 trillion-plus deficits has driven the national debt above $16 trillion. The magnitude of that figure has intensified debate in Congress over spending and taxes but little movement toward compromise.

Many fear the budget deadlock will send the economy over a "fiscal cliff" next year, when tax increases and deep spending cuts will take effect unless a budget deal is reached.

Obama wants to eliminate the income tax cuts for families that make more than $250,000.

Republicans in Congress and Romney have resisted. They argue that with the economy still weak, the government should not be raising anyone's taxes.

Congress may address the budget crisis during a lame-duck session of Congress after the November elections. ( Associated Press )

READ MORE - US deficit tops $1 trillion for fourth year

Does a changing economy mean the "End of Men"?


Does a changing economy mean the "End of Men"? - For all the bluster of her book's title, "The End of Men: And the Rise of Women," Hanna Rosin is surprisingly ambivalent about whether men are, in fact, doomed.

Women are quicker to adapt to the economy's new demands, Rosin says, pursuing higher education in record numbers and dominating fast-growing professions such as nursing and accounting.

At the same time, men watch the shrinking of manufacturing, construction and other traditionally male industries as if paralyzed, on the couch with a beer in hand.



http://newscdn.fooyoh.com/Reuters_Entertainment/2012-09-07/2012-09-07T204830Z_1_CDEE8861LSW00_RTROPTP_2_TURKEY.JPG

More than two years of research and reporting, though, have left Rosin unconvinced that the end of men is inevitable.

"It's an obnoxious title," she conceded about her book and the 2010 cover story in the Atlantic magazine that launched it. "And I think my argument would have been much easier to make if I believed that women's brains are one way and men's brains are another way and the economy prefers our brains right now."

Rosin draws on data and anecdotes from a wide range of sources to depict a new global matriarchy.

She charts the feminization of pharmacy work, visiting the University of Wisconsin's pharmacy school in Madison, where 62 percent of the freshman class is female. A group of girlfriends there are aiming for six-figure salaries; one envisions a husband who greets her after work "with a freshly baked cookie."

"The economy is incredibly fluid right now. There are always going to be some kinds of new jobs that the economy throws up, so the question is, who is nimble and willing to get with the program and be responsive? And for whatever reason that's not men," she said.

A PYRRHIC VICTORY?


Rosin, a senior editor at the Atlantic and a founder of Slate magazine's women's site DoubleX, points to growth in female-dominated occupational sectors as proof that women are winning the day. "Of the 30 professions projected to add the most jobs over the next decade, women dominate 20," she writes.

Her book reels off a slew of data points, including the facts that women now hold more than 51 percent of managerial jobs and earn almost 60 percent of bachelor degrees.

However, she barely pauses to acknowledge some realities behind the statistics, such as the thankless nature of many of the professions in which women dominate, including home health and food preparation, which pay low wages and lack benefits or flexibility.

Nor does she dwell on the "glass ceiling" that keeps the upper echelons of politics and corporations overwhelmingly male.

There's also little mention of the gender pay gap, which means that woman on average still earn around 20 percent less than men.

In an interview with Reuters, Rosin said these anachronisms make her observations on the rise of women more timely than ever. Women are moving into breadwinner roles, she says, and work culture must reflect that.

"You can't have a workplace, half of which is women, and still pretend like we live in a nation in which men work and women stay at home - a nation that has so little flexibility, so little maternity leave. How can we possibly be the only industrialized nation that has no paid maternity leave?"

RESISTANCE AND BACKLASH

She points to the fact that households, like labor policy, have often been slow to adapt, and women still do a greater share of the housework than men, even if they are also holding down full-time jobs.

"I think we have a cultural block about men doing more in domestic roles," Rosin said. "Our thinking about men and the way men behave has to change a lot before we can push through this last barrier," she said.

Due to be published on Tuesday against a backdrop of fierce debate about contraception and abortion in campaigning for November's presidential election in the United States, "The End of Men" is surprisingly silent on the legislative backlash in parts of the country on those issues.

In the interview, Rosin said this backlash was a reaction to the growing visibility of women's success.

"The only reason to talk about contraception is because it is so directly related to the rise of women. There are all these retrograde ways to address what's happening with women and to fight back at it without going at it directly."

"The difference between sexism and racism is that many people have wives and daughters, so generally people don't go at it head-on. They go at these in other ways, like saying, 'This is about our moral values,'" Rosin said.

NOT QUITE THE END

Despite her arguments, Rosen - who is bringing up both a son and a daughter - said all was not lost for men.

She said nowadays, like women before them, some men were moving beyond restrictive gender norms.

Her book refers to managers at an offshore oil drilling company who tried to weed out macho behavior to reduce workplace accidents. The workers, all male, became "kindler, gentler people," according to a production operator. One worker even sent his colleague, a new father, Baby Mozart and Chopin tapes.

The study moved her deeply, she said, because it showed the possibility of going beyond damaging gender stereotypes.

"You take the most macho guys ever, and you can acculturate them to be something completely different from what they think they are. But it's pretty awesome to think about, if you imagine that transition happening over a long, slow period." ( Reuters )

READ MORE - Does a changing economy mean the "End of Men"?

Ten Most Common Personal Finance Mistakes


Ten Most Common Personal Finance Mistakes - All of us are guilty of a few bad financial habits, and most of us share a few. When financial advisors first meet with clients, they usually find a familiar set of money-losing miscues, from checking credit reports too infrequently (or not at all), paying too much for insurance, or buying stocks for the wrong reasons.

Rarely are any of these bad habits alone enough to sink us. But taken together over time, these small leaks in our financial ship rob us of amounts we’d never stand for losing all at once.

We asked several financial advisors to name the most common personal finance mistakes they find, and provide solutions to each. The good news is that some of the most frequently made missteps are also the most preventable.

http://media.cnbc.com/i/CNBC/Sections/Personal-Finance-Section/_Slideshows/Money_Mistakes_Common/10-most-common-money-mistakes-cover.jpg

1) Overpaying for Home Insurance

Odds are the premium on your homeowner’s insurance is too high. In a recent survey by insurance provider ACE Private Risk Services, 78 percent of independent insurance agents said homeowners are overpaying for their house insurance.

What to do: Hike your deductible. By raising the amount you pay in the event of a mishap, you let the insurer off the hook for part of the cost and, in turn, lower your premium. “If a home is insured for $1 million and the owner who pays a $500 deductible raises that to $2,500, they can save $900 a year in premium savings,” said David Spencer, vice president of ACE private risk services.

2) Putting Off Buying Life or Health Insurance

You’re healthy, so you don’t think you need to insure yourself against sickness, injury, or death. The older you get, however, the more expensive insurance gets.

What to do: Start paying now and you’ll pay less. “The sooner you buy, the better off you are,” says Suzanna de Baca, vice president of wealth strategies at Ameriprise Financial. If you get insured at age 25, instead of waiting until you’re feeling mortal at 55, de Baca says, you can save up to $10,000 across those three decades.

3) Underestimating Health-Care Costs

Sooner or later, most Americans are taken surprise by a high co-pay charge, or prescription fee. This only gets more common — and more scary — as you grow older.

What to do: According to Fidelity, retired couples need an average of $10,750 per year to cover out-of-pocket medical expenses. This is 4 percent more than those who retired a year ago. When computing what you need for retirement, plan accordingly. Increase your contributions to your 401(k) or other workplace savings plans. If you have already maxed out your workplace savings plan, save additional money in an IRA.

4) Passing Up Tax Breaks

Small investors often look only at the return an instrument is giving them, and overlook how taxes take a bite out of those returns. Morningstar figures that over the 74-year period ending in 2010, investors who did not manage investments in a tax-sensitive manner gave up between one and two percentage points of their annual returns to taxes.

What to do: First, take a look at which of your investments are taxable, tax deferred, or tax-free, says John Sweeney, executive vice-president of Fidelity’s Planning and Advisory Services, and plan to commit some ordinary income to tax-deferred accounts, such as defined contribution plans such as 401(k)s or traditional IRAs and annuities.

When buying and selling stocks that pay dividends, or managing your mutual funds, bone up on tax rules about qualified dividends — those paid on stocks that you’ve held for 60 days or more within prescribed windows that qualify the dividends to be taxed as capital gains. Selling stocks even a day to soon can result in paying tax on dividends as ordinary income, costing you 10 percent or more.

5) Paying Late Fees

Are you paying late fees, even though you keep up with your bills? Late fees not only add to expenses, they can negatively impact your credit score.

What to do: Mounting late fees are usually the result of due dates that are scattered throughout the month without regard to any rational schedule. You simply need to align your due dates.

Call your credit-card companies, utilities, and other service providers and ask to have your due dates changed to your paydays, when you have money available. Most companies have two billing cycles a month, and will gladly accommodate your request to switch to the one that makes sense for you, says online account manager Manilla.com. Next, create a monthly bill reminder calendar that works for you and pick one or two days during the month to pay all of your bills.

6) Buying Stocks by Their Brand

Small investors often buy stock because they have a good experience with the company. This makes perfect sense, but make sure to ask yourself what it is you like: Is it the product or the service? Or something less bankable, such as the image of the brand? Going with your gut without doing your homework can lose you money in a hurry.

What to do: Image counts, but price and valuation matter more, says Brian Gendreau, market strategist for Cetera Financial Group. “Investors who buy stocks without regard to price often find themselves with dead money for years to come.”

Gendreau suggests you check out the price-earnings ratio, or P/E, one of the main metrics analysts use to compare values between companies. Many financial sites (including CNBC.com) calculate the P/E ratio for you, but you can do it yourself by dividing a stock’s current share price by its earnings per share. If the number is high relative to other stocks in the same sector (like retail or technology), what you’re buying may be too expensive, relative to other companies.

7) Investing Too Conservatively

A recent Fidelity study found that many young investors have low (or even no) stock exposure in their portfolio. This is understandable, given the ill treatment the stock market has been dealing out in the past few years. The thing about no risk, though, is there’s no reward. The financial system is pretty much built on it.

What to do: Make the most of the years you have ahead to grow wealth. Consider increasing your stock exposure or you “may hinder the portfolio growth opportunities needed over time,” according to Fidelity’s John Sweeney.

Of course, your age, retirement goals, financial situation, and tolerance for risk should guide your decisions, as well. But consider: An aggressive mix of 83 percent stocks (foreign and domestic) and 17 percent bonds growing at an annual rate of return of 8.35 percent will earn $350 a month more than an asset allocation of 50 percent stocks, 40 percent bonds, and 10 percent cash.

8) Paying Retail

Though not an investment snafu, paying full price on purchases can be a big drain on your finances. In today’s digital age, there are many tools available to help consumers make better buying decisions.

What to do: Make savvy comparisons. Websites and mobile apps like Red Laser, PriceGrabber, and NextTag find retailers with the best prices, according to Trae Bodge, senior editor for RetailMeNot.com.

Next, become a coupon cutter. You can find discounts online for everything from apparel to conference registrations via coupon code websites such as Bodge’s RetailMeNot.com. As for fashionistas, two words: flash sale. With sites out there like Belle & Clive, which sells designer brands at a discount, there really is no reason to pay full price.

9) Leaving Valuables Uninsured

Lately wine, art, and gold have become favorite investments, especially for high-earners. But according to insurer ACE Private Risk Services, nearly 40 percent of high-net-worth individuals don’t have their collections insured with a valuables policy.

What to do: Have your items appraised and shop around for insurance that fits your collection. If you already have insurance, consider whether you need an update. As your collection appreciates, its value may have outpaced the coverage you have on it, leaving you underinsured.

10) Not Checking Your Credit Score


We know you’ve heard it before, but if you don’t check your credit report at least three times a year, you may be leaving fraudulent charges undetected. Credit card companies, mortgage underwriters, or auto lenders could have a much different picture of you than you think. If they erroneously think you’re high-risk, they’ll charge you more to borrow.

What to do: Request a free credit report online from one of the three credit rating agencies — Equifax, Experian, or Transunion. Each is required to provide you with a free report once a year. Flag any unexpected changes to your report, such as loans you don’t remember, and report any discrepancies to the credit rating agencies. Don’t dismiss any odd item, no matter how small the amount — some thieves test your awareness with a small purchase to see if you notice, according to Manilla.com. A few months later, check again using another of the agencies. (


READ MORE - Ten Most Common Personal Finance Mistakes

400-year-old diamond may fetch $4 million at auction


http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/.4ScLXUHPzefbiME6YL3Vw--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en/blogs/thesideshow/BeauSancy.jpg
The 400-year-old Beau Sancy diamond (Remy de la Mauviniere/AP)


400-year-old diamond may fetch $4 million at auction - Next month, Sotheby's will auction a 400-year-old diamond that is estimated to be worth between $2 million and $4 million. The "Beau Sancy" is one of the world's oldest known diamonds and weighs 34.98 carats.


The diamond will be on public display in Paris, London and Zurich until it goes up for auction in Geneva on May 14.

The Beau Sancy once belonged to France's Queen Marie de Medici and was originally cut from a gem mine in the Indian city of Golconda. It was owned by the last Emperor of Germany, Wilhelm II, before being acquired by a private European owner.

Diamond website overabillion.com says the Beau Sancy gets its name from 16th century French financier and diplomat Nicholas Harlay de Sancy. The gem is described as a "perfect, colorless, rounded pear-shaped diamond." ( The Sideshow )

READ MORE - 400-year-old diamond may fetch $4 million at auction

Australian Company IAG Rewards New Moms for Returning to Work


Australian Company IAG Rewards New Moms for Returning to Work - One of Australia's largest companies is making it easier for new parents to juggle work and family: Starting this week, new moms who return to work at the Insurance Australia Group (IAG) will get double pay for their first six weeks back after maternity leave.

"Yes it's generous, but we're a business and it is about making sure we get quality people coming back to us," IAG chief executive Mike Wilkins told the Sydney Morning Herald.



http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/.OcPLZNWVX7OY588l6TVQg--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTMxMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en-US/blogs/partner/470_2332446.0


IAG already offers one of the most generous maternity leave policies in the industry -- 14 weeks of paid time off after giving birth or adopting a child. Their six-week "welcome back bonus" is on top of that -- and in addition to an Australian government policy that gives new parents up to 18 weeks pay at minimum wage or a $5,400 "Baby Bonus" per child, whichever is greater.

It's a stark contrast to parental leave policies in the United States, where the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 mandates that companies over a certain size offer up to 12 weeks of job-protected parental leave, but without pay. The United States is one of just four countries in the world without a national law requiring paid time off for new parents (the other countries are Liberia, Papua New Guinea, and Swaziland).



"This initiative came out of discussions that we had with our people -- and specifically women -- on the difficulties and pressures that they faced upon returning to the workforce," Wilkins told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. "We think this welcome back payment is a good first step in helping them to address a number of those pressures."

IAG relationships manager Rebecca Isaachsen, who is 43 and pregnant with her third child, agrees.

"This will take away the financial worry," she told Australia's Daily Telegraph. "This could be the difference in the choice between having kids and not having kids."

More than half of IAG's 10,000 employees are women, the International Business Times reported, and 500 to 600 IAG employees go on maternity leave each year. The company's goal is to have one third of all senior management positions filled by women by 2015, Wilkins said, adding that he thinks the welcome back bonus "will help us achieve that, by really ensuring we are an employer of choice for mothers and families."

The bonuses will be offset by the fact that the company will not have to recruit or train new staff members to replace those who go on leave, Wilkins said. And the company really values the skills honed by motherhood.

"We want people who can multitask inside the organization," he told the Daily Telegraph. "And I think mums are the ultimate multitaskers." ( Yahoo! Shine )

READ MORE - Australian Company IAG Rewards New Moms for Returning to Work

Apple to pay dividend, start stock buybacks


Apple to pay dividend, start stock buybacks - Apple is finally acknowledging that it has more money than it needs. But don't expect it to cut prices on iPhones and iPads. Instead, the company said on Monday that it will reward its shareholders with a dividend and a stock buyback program.

Apple, the world's most valuable publicly traded company, sits on $97.6 billion in cash and securities.


http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/MZmzp5zarc9JXT1GlZdc7w--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9aW5zZXQ7aD01NTY7cT04NTt3PTUxMg--/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/d2363888f5025d070a0f6a706700d079.jpg
FILE - In this Oct. 4, 2011 file photo, Apple CEO Tim Cook gestures during the introduction of the iPhone 4S, at Apple headquarters in Cupertino, Calif. Apple Inc. is finally using its $98 billion pile of cash to reward shareholders, saying it's instituting both a dividend and share buyback program. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

The company has stockpiled the cash through a combination of great ideas and prudence. Apple spends money, to be sure, building data centers, buying parts for its products and pursuing ambitious projects such as a new 2.8-million-square-foot headquarters that has been likened to a spaceship. It also invests in the research and development of new technology and negotiates an occasional acquisition.

But Apple simply hasn't managed to spend its earnings faster than people are lining up to buy its iPads, iPhones and other gadgets.

The decision to return some of that money to investors is a clear signal that Apple is taking a different approach in the post-Jobs era.

Former CEO Steve Jobs resisted calls to issue dividends for years. He argued that the money was better used to give Apple maneuvering room to acquire other companies, for instance. Apple did pay a quarterly dividend between 1987 and 1995, but Jobs was not involved with the company at the time.

Jobs died in October after a long fight with cancer.

Since then, pressure had been mounting on new CEO Tim Cook. Apple's ever-growing pile of cash was earning a paltry amount of interest and the fact that it was sitting there unused could have left the company open to charges of mismanagement and possible shareholder lawsuits.

On Monday, Cook said that, with as much cash as Apple has on hand, a dividend won't restrain the company's options.

"These decisions will not close any doors for us," he told analysts and reporters on a conference call.

Indeed, Apple can afford it. The dividend, which should placate shareholders, will cost about $10 billion the first year. Apple generated $31 billion in cash in the fiscal year that ended in September and analysts expect it to add another $70 billion to $85 billion this year.

Apple said it will pay a quarterly dividend of $2.65 per share, starting in its fiscal fourth quarter, which begins July 1.

The dividend works out to $10.60 annually, or 1.8 percent of the current stock price. Although Microsoft Corp., pays 2.5 percent of its stock price in dividends, and Hewlett-Packard Co. pays 2 percent, analyst Tavis McCourt at Morgan Keegan said Apple's dividend is relatively generous for a large technology company.

Energy and phone companies often pay dividends worth more than 5 percent of their stock price.

In absolute terms, Apple will pay one of the richest dividends in the U.S. The roughly $10 billion it will spend in its first year, places it just below companies including AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc., which are among the biggest spenders because they use dividends as their main way to attract investors.

Exxon Mobil Corp., the world's second largest company by market capitalization, pays about $9 billion in dividends annually.

The dividend opens up ownership of Apple shares to a wider range of stock mutual funds, potentially boosting the stock price in the long term. Many "value-oriented" stock funds are not allowed to buy stocks that don't pay dividends.

Apple said the $10 billion share buyback program will begin next fiscal year, which starts Sept. 30, and runs for three years.

Investors had been expecting the announcement, driving Apple's stock up 37 percent since January, when management first hinted in that a dividend was in the works.

Buybacks are a popular alternative to dividends, since they reduce the number of shares outstanding. That means every remaining investor owns a larger share of the company.

Apple's stock hit a new high Monday before closing at $601.10, up $15.53. Since Steve Jobs' death on Oct. 5, Apple's stock is up nearly 60 percent. The company is worth $553 billion.

McCourt raised his price target on Apple's stock to $800 on Monday, becoming the first Wall Street analyst to do so. A dozen have price targets in the $700 range. He had been expecting the dividend, he said, and the main reason for the higher price target is the company's tremendous profit growth.

The dividend and buyback announcement comes three days after the launch of Apple's latest iPad tablet in the U.S. and nine other countries. Cook said sales the first few days set a record, but he gave no details.

Cook said the company also considered splitting its stock and continues to look at that option. Stock splits increase the number of shares while reducing their value, potentially making it easier for small investors to buy them. But Cook said "there's very little support" for the idea that stock splits can help the stock overall.

Cook suggested that the dividend could have been larger if U.S. tax laws were different.

Cook said that as Apple analyzed how much it could give out to shareholders, it looked solely at the cash it has in the U.S. Like many big exporters, Apple has much of its cash overseas —some $64 billion, specifically.

Apple is reluctant to bring back overseas profits. In addition to being taxed in their respective countries, those profits would be subject to the 35 percent U.S. corporate tax rate.

"Current tax laws provide a considerable economic disincentive to U.S. companies that might otherwise repatriate a substantial amount of foreign cash," Chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer said.

Cook said Apple looked at how much domestic cash it had, then set aside enough for planned investments and unforeseen outlays. What was left over would be given out to shareholders, he said.

That suggests that if Apple could bring back its $64 billion in overseas money, the rewards to shareholders could be larger. Corporations have been clamoring for a change in tax laws, or a repeat of a 2004 tax amnesty on repatriated earnings. ( Associated Press )

READ MORE - Apple to pay dividend, start stock buybacks

Do You Face 'Money Death' in Old Age?


Do You Face 'Money Death' in Old Age? - "Money death" is a dramatic term used in a contrarian study about strategies that help people avoid outliving their assets. Brandes Investment Partners, a money-management company based in San Diego, notes in "Boomers Behaving Badly" that running out of money is a top concern of retirees. With safe investments paying historically low interest rates and a still-shaky economic recovery, retirement security concerns are getting worse these days, not better.

Yet for many investors approaching their retirement years, Brandes lays out a more optimistic path that relies on moving away from conventional retirement strategies in favor of a more aggressive approach. The Brandes retirement portfolio is heavily weighted in dividend-paying stocks and higher-yield corporate bonds, even for investors well past retirement age.


http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/zJTBZKG4A52xXp0.HLHxPw--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTE0MztxPTg1O3c9MTkw/http://l.yimg.com/os/284/2012/02/16/87639303-jpg_191912.jpg


In most simulations, such holdings return significantly more money than a traditional portfolio containing lower-return bonds and other "safe" holdings. And the odds of such a portfolio running out of funds remain very low. To compensate for the added risks of that more aggressive strategy, Brandes further advocates that people buy longevity insurance, setting aside the purchase funds right now for an annuity that doesn't begin making payments until they turn 85.

Such annuities were endorsed last week in a set of retirement-plan rule changes announced by the U.S. Treasury, and supported by a research report from the Obama administration's Council of Economic Advisers.

"I think the immediate impact [of the rule changes] is that insurance companies will be much more aggressive in marketing annuities to the retirement sector," says Barry Gillman, research director of the Brandes Institute Advisory Board, which issued the study. "Longer term, I think it could be a very big influence in allowing people to take back control of their own retirement."

Gillman stressed that Brandes does not recommend longevity annuities for everyone. They make the most sense for healthy people who expect to live into their late 80s or 90s. Also, they make the most sense for relatively affluent people who could spend $100,000 or more right now on a longevity annuity without making a big dent in their retirement nest egg.

Most importantly, the purchase of such an annuity must be linked with the higher-return investment strategy. Of the two-pronged approach, Gillman says, a higher-return portfolio for retirees is the bigger behavioral shift.

Citing investment and behavioral research, the study said that 60 percent of a person's investment income during their retirement years is earned after they retire. Adopting a conservative investment strategy during those years, it said, is not the best way to produce more income. Yet people's fear of losing money is so strong these days that they favor a defensive investment posture which Brandes feels is not in their best long-term interest.

Brandes' study evaluated a sample portfolio made up of 80 percent dividend-paying stocks and 20 percent higher-yield bonds. The test portfolio was diversified across global markets and included different asset classes. Also, Brandes stressed, the portfolio must be regularly rebalanced to maintain the appropriate investment mix.

In contrast, Gillman says, "we have the whole [retirement] industry that is focused on the conventional approach, with target-date funds and glide paths [shifting stock-bond allocations] that move into more conservative holdings."

Before the advent of longevity annuities, he says, there was no easily available downside protection to encourage investors to move away from such a defensive investment position. Such annuities have only been around for a few years, and are not widely sold or heavily marketed.

In its purest form, Gillman says, a person would buy a longevity annuity at the age of 60 or 65. Because the odds of surviving to 85 are only about 50-50 for people turning 65, insurers are willing to provide attractive payouts. Someone paying $100,000 for such an annuity could expect annual income payments of about $75,000 when they turn 85, Gillman says. If they live into their late 80s and, especially, into their 90s, the product produces increasingly attractive returns, even allowing for the impact of inflation.

One concern annuity investors have, of course, is getting nothing for their $100,000. If they die before payments begin, the insurance company keeps their money. For this reason, Brandes feels the longevity annuity is best viewed not as a standalone decision, but as part of a comprehensive retirement investment strategy.

In nearly all cases, the investment portfolio Brandes recommends would outperform conventional portfolios by much more than the price of the annuity. If the retiree dies before collecting the annuity payments, the odds strongly favor his or her estate still being better off.

People considering Brandes's advice need to answer six core questions to help them decide:


  1. How long will you live? There are many online life expectancy calculators that use a person's current health and family health history to estimate their remaining years.
  2. What is your money-life ratio? This ratio, Brandes said, takes your financial assets and divides them by the difference between your planned spending and other income (from work, pensions, and Social Security) during the first year of retirement. If the ratio is large, your odds of "money death" are small and you don't need a longevity annuity. If the ratio is small, you probably don't have enough money to buy the annuity and, unless you sharply cut your retirement spending, will almost certainly encounter money death. People with ratios between 18 and 30 should consider Brandes's ideas about how to outlive their assets, the study said.
  3. Can you adjust your retirement date and your retirement spending levels to significantly improve your money-life ratio?
  4. How much longevity income would 10 percent of your wealth buy, and is this enough to implement Brandes's strategy?
  5. Do you have the fortitude and discipline to pursue a higher-return retirement investment strategy, especially through a declining market cycle?
  6. Do you have estate considerations that argue against the Brandes strategy in favor of preserving principal at all costs? ( usnews.com )

READ MORE - Do You Face 'Money Death' in Old Age?